Frugal median
—
Across all valid probe-hour samples
Stored RIPE Atlas data
Preliminary results
Australia Usenet Latency
A paired comparison from the same 25 Australian RIPE Atlas probes, measured hourly.
Latest measurement
Loading results
Stored data refreshes automatically
Published by Frugal Usenet using public RIPE Atlas measurements. Provider names are used for comparison only.
Reporting window
Loading the selected reporting window
Loading stored measurement results…
Results could not be loaded
The hourly updater may not have completed its first run.
Frugal 95th percentile
—
95% of Frugal samples were at or below this
Paired median advantage
—
Waiting for paired samples
Probe wins
0 of 25
Waiting for complete comparison data.
Provider comparison
Median and 95th-percentile latency
Lower is better. All values are milliseconds.
Paired comparison
Frugal’s advantage using matched probe-hours
Each comparison uses the same probe during the same hour.
Hourly trend
Median latency over time
Each point is the median across reporting probes that hour.
Waiting for hourly data.
Probe detail
Results by probe, nearest city, and ISP
Values are per-probe medians for the selected period.
Methodology
How these figures are calculated
Measurements
Public IPv4 ICMP ping measurements run hourly from a fixed 25-probe Australian cohort. Each run sends four packets one second apart.
Latency statistics
Each probe-hour sample is the median of its successful packet round-trip times. Provider median and p95 values are calculated from those samples.
Paired comparison
Frugal and each competitor are compared only where both have a result from the same probe in the same rounded UTC hour. Positive advantage means Frugal had lower latency.
Probe locations and networks
Probe coordinates and ASNs come from RIPE Atlas. City labels are approximate nearest-city labels; ISP names come from the RIPEstat ASN registry view.
Raw public measurements: